FOR...
I think all people should have equal rights and no one's rights should be subject to a vote. Gay or straight, we should all be able to get married anywhere we want and no one should be able to take that away from us or even decide in favor of that with a vote. We are all entitled to the same rights. It should not even be a question.
AGAINST...
Yes, all people in the country have the inalenable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. An with that comes the ability to file a joint income tax return, collect SS survivor benefits, hospital visitation rights, etc. Hence, we should all embrace public legislative efforts to "legalize" relationships between two adults irrespective of the fact that they may happen to share a particular gender.
However, based on our culture and community standards, a marriage is between a man and a woman. To suggest that it is not is to deny the fact that there is a fundamental biological difference between a union between those of opposite sexes and those of the same. Hence, we should endeavor to identify a new, legal term that adequately and respectfully acknowledges this difference and would permit this very decisive issue to come to a logical and proper end. Those who have been intensively lobbying this matter, in my opinion, would better serve their constituents by finding a middle ground that respects the long standing cultural and religious foundations of the institution of marriage while guaranteeing the rights that all people deserve. Until this happens, we will never see closure on this issue. The Legislatures, politicians, lobbyings etc. may be able to legislate how we are supposed act, but not how we feel.